Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime17.8 Days
Run DateNov 30 '21 at 12:50
Run Duration310 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 80.3
1-Core 176
2-Core 352
106% 203 Pts
4-Core 664
8-Core 1,270
115% 967 Pts
64-Core 1,629
101% 1,629 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 139
Parallax 127
103% 131 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 132
Splatting 117
99% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,532
Write 2,356
Mixed 1,659
485% 2,182 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 78.7
259% 88.4 MB/s
DQ Read 951
DQ Write 818
DQ Mixed 877
659% 882 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Amd-raid Array 1 479GB
161GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 845 809 887 811 885 812 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 863
Mixed 471
SusWrite 842
151% 662 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 11.5
81% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 393
DQ Mixed 200
179% 264 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 107%
Great: 221%
Amd-raid WDC WD40EZRZ-00G 4TB
251GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 83 84 86 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 109
Write 107
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 82.1
67% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55%
Great: 97%
Amd-raid WDC WD20EZRX-00D 2TB
9GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 69 67 71 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 70.6
Write 75.2
Mixed 36.4
SusWrite 61.4
45% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38%
Great: 84%
Amd-raid ST31000528AS 1TB
24GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 79 79 67 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
47% Average
Read 90.8
Write 89.3
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 72.7
55% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47%
Great: 68%
Amd-raid ST3500630AS 500GB
16GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 42.3
Write 20.3
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 43.7
25% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 40%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7
3GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 6 5.4 5.4 4.8 6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 126
Write 4
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.2
26% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
42% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 22%
Generic Mini SD Reader 8GB
7GB free, PID 6377
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
7.49% Terrible
Read 19.9
Write 14
Mixed 15.8
SusWrite 14.3
21% 16 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.49%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.7% Good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 26.9
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 29
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,032
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback