Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '22 at 21:05
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 46%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 198
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 423
57% 427 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.2.1
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.2% Average
Lighting 50
Reflection 59.1
Parallax 0.3
41% 36.5 fps
MRender 59.3
Gravity 54.9
Splatting 43.8
42% 52.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 479GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 215 47 11 108 5.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 500
Write 515
Mixed 225
SusWrite 85
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 0
50% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 2.2
DQ Mixed 1.3
1% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 221%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 36.1
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 42
SC Mixed 28.4
90% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback