Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 164%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive430% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory41.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '22 at 23:11
Run Duration428 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$314
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 78.5
1-Core 148
2-Core 295
93% 174 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 1,127
101% 853 Pts
64-Core 2,204
136% 2,204 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$450
Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB; RTX 3070 Founders Edition
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 221
Reflection 213
Parallax 220
180% 218 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 156
Splatting 139
132% 165 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 151%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$117
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3263 3273 3297 2561 1608 1181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
430% Outstanding
Read 2,823
Write 3,350
Mixed 3,070
SusWrite 2,531
665% 2,944 MB/s
4K Read 78.9
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 109
353% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,235
DQ Write 1,099
DQ Mixed 1,153
868% 1,162 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 430%
Great: 477%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
300GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 449 449 454 454 458 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 450
Mixed 438
SusWrite 454
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 58.5
191% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 117%
Great: 133%
PNY CS900 M.2 500GB SSD
466GB free
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 435 193 110 107 368 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.6% Good
Read 253
Write 107
Mixed 123
SusWrite 273
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 31.8
108% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 84.2
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 153
106% 130 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 103%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
283GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2282 592 597 598 597 596 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 2,542
Write 2,380
Mixed 1,731
SusWrite 877
421% 1,882 MB/s
4K Read 66.7
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 88.6
300% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,348
DQ Write 1,199
DQ Mixed 1,252
945% 1,266 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 305%
Great: 340%
WDC WDS500G2B0C 500GB
272GB free
Firmware: 211210WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 917 424 429 435 434 441 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,571
Write 1,701
Mixed 1,352
SusWrite 513
288% 1,284 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 77.6
272% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,260
DQ Write 1,228
DQ Mixed 982
809% 1,156 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 233%
Great: 238%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
429GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 156 159 158 158 162 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
74% Very good
Read 102
Write 136
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 156
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
95% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 45.6
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 40.4
120% 42.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 36.5
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,944 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $944
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback