Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141016
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateNov 16 '20 at 19:08
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$95
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 95
2-Core 200
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 648
63% 519 Pts
64-Core 795
49% 795 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.2% Below average
Lighting 38.2
Reflection 64
Parallax 55.2
31% 52.5 fps
MRender 69.9
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 53.3
49% 60.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$192
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 367 374 153 106 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 437
Mixed 409
SusWrite 252
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 46.4
155% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 351
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$192
272GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 326 351 403 410 390 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 444
Mixed 404
SusWrite 370
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 46.1
152% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 353
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 103 94 101 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 112
Write 80.3
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 97.5
68% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 83%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
121GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 120 113 119 114 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 111
Write 114
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 116
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.8
346% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 136%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$130
335GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 98 95 96 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 93.5
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 96
62% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 70%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
9GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 71 69 73 76 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38% Below average
Read 62.5
Write 63.2
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 69.7
47% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38%
Great: 59%
ST316031 8AS 160GB
76GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 35 35 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 100
Write 94.5
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 34.9
94% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 43%
ST325082 3AS 250GB
4GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 34 34 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.9% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 36
Mixed 28
SusWrite 34.4
45% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
50% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 22%
WDC WD20 EARX-32PASB0 2TB
800GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0 0 0 24 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 132
Write 116
Mixed 101
SusWrite 4
110% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 40%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
54GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 82.2
Write 84
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 4
79% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
120% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905598-009.A00G 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
108% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 41.5
121% 42.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 21.6
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 2,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $704
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback