Today's hottest deals

Asrock X99 Extreme4/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4/3.1  (all builds)
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime12.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '16 at 21:16
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 184
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 618
58% 484 Pts
64-Core 828
51% 828 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Nvidia(10DE 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 368.39
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 23.6
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 21.3
19% 21.1 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 18.2
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$192
687GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 518
Write 411
Mixed 424
100% 451 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 24
121% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 36.7
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 22.5
55% 108 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 133%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
756GB free
Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 129
Write 131
Mixed 121
96% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.45
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.33
134% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 104%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
85GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 159
Write 125
Mixed 127
103% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 2.52
4K Mixed 0.22
101% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 100%
ST2000DL 001-9VT156 2TB
855GB free, PID 1018
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 38.9
Write 38.5
Mixed 38.7
50% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 0.72
4K Mixed 0.15
31% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 18%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
650GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 37.3
Mixed 36.5
48% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.28
74% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905598-009.A00G 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 40.5
118% 41.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 20.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4/3.1 Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $562
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback