Today's hottest deals

Microelectronics G353

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicroelectronics G353  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock Z390 Pro4
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 01 '20 at 01:44
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$385
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 97.8
1-Core 152
2-Core 301
101% 184 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 1,135
103% 867 Pts
64-Core 1,656
102% 1,656 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
Zotac(19DA 7500) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 152
Parallax 155
134% 157 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 132
Splatting 108
113% 143 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 121%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 250GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 231 228 231 232 231 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 449
Write 415
Mixed 352
SusWrite 247
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 47.3
152% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 262
221% 322 MB/s
WDC WDS250G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
464GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 436 422 426 424 423 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 450
Write 429
Mixed 371
SusWrite 435
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 48
161% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 256
218% 320 MB/s
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$71
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 146 148 149 151 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 153
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 149
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 86%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA641 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: MKAOA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 130 132 132 132 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 126
Write 132
Mixed 71
SusWrite 132
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 88%
WDC WD16 00AAJS-75M0A0 160GB
137GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0 0 0 84 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.3% Poor
Read 98.1
Write 98.1
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 14.1
86% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.13 MB/s
WDC WD10 EZEX-00MFCA0 1TB
931GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 41 58 57 58 59 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.3% Above average
Read 196
Write 187
Mixed 124
SusWrite 59.3
181% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
141% 1.8 MB/s
ST310005 24AS 1TB
931GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 40 58 57 58 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 124
Write 119
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 52.6
120% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 37%
WDC WD50 00AZLX-00CL5A0 500GB
466GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 105 100 106 103 104 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.2% Above average
Read 179
Write 171
Mixed 105
SusWrite 103
182% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
136% 1.6 MB/s
ST316031 8AS 160GB
149GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 105 100 106 103 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 92.5
Write 40.1
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 103
97% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 43%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00BN5A0 1TB
931GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 40 58 57 58 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 139
Write 165
Mixed 105
SusWrite 58.8
155% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
110% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 72%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00KUWA0 1TB
931GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 60 57 57 58 158 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.9% Above average
Read 212
Write 191
Mixed 139
SusWrite 83.6
201% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
131% 1.67 MB/s
Hitachi Easy Device 500GB
417GB free, PID 3010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 33.5
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 35.2
43% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 45.7
MC Mixed 34
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 50.2
SC Mixed 33.9
103% 36.2 GB/s
Latency 47
85% 47 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 116%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G353 Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

System: Microelectronics G353

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $423
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback