Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory	17.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 10 '20 at 01:19
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 23,588 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Memory 89.7 1-Core 125 2-Core 230 84% 148 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 592 61% 493 Pts	64-Core 615 38% 615 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 1AB1) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5730 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	45.2% Average	Lighting 59.3 Reflection 58.7 Parallax 48.3 48% 55.5 fps	MRender 44.1 Gravity 49.1 Splatting 49.2 39% 47.5 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2200V_MTF 512GB 896 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 426GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1MA0V4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 959 964 995 990 987 1002 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 893 Write 998 Mixed 962 SusWrite 983 217% 959 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 69.5 4K Mixed 45.5 150% 50.4 MB/s	DQ Read 451 DQ Write 751 DQ Mixed 618 464% 607 MB/s
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 178%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 871GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 398 421 415 405 421 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Read 454 Write 426 Mixed 320 SusWrite 411 91% 403 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 71.4 4K Mixed 36.2 126% 45 MB/s	DQ Read 330 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 247 200% 284 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 133%
WDC WD50 00BEVT-00ZAT0 500GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 77GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 17 17 17 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	6.68% Terrible	Read 15.2 Write 17.2 Mixed 16.5 SusWrite 16.3 23% 16.3 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.68% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMSX16GX4M1A2666C18 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 24GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2667, 2667 MHz 16384, 8192 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.1% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 15 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 17.4 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	34x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	22x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	12x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $58Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	8x
Micron_2200V_MTF 512GBNvmeBench 152%, 896 samples	6x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	11x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	7x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 16GBHynixBench 77%, 456 samples	7x