Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory20.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '20 at 02:51
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 63.4
2-Core 94.9
48% 75.6 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 336
35% 281 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1AB1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5709
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 10
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 1.38
8% 7.64 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 36.3
Splatting 40.9
25% 28.7 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2200V_MTF 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A0V4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 978 843 811 875 960 1009 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 984
Write 938
Mixed 970
SusWrite 912
214% 951 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 43.7
140% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 464
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 545
393% 505 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 160%
Great: 178%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
529GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 377 369 389 439 460 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 454
Mixed 419
SusWrite 413
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 41.5
138% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 326
242% 322 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 102%
Great: 133%
WDC WD50 00BEVT-00ZAT0 500GB
83GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 38 39 39 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 30.5
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 37.5
43% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSX16GX4M1A2666C18 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
72.9% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.6
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 20
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GT Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback