Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateSep 25 '20 at 04:31
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$80
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 200
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 382
49% 372 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (94th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (68 fps cap detected)
55.3% Above average
Lighting 67.7
Reflection 67.6
Parallax 58.8
55% 64.7 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 65.3
Splatting 69.3
56% 67.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 360
Write 344
Mixed 264
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 40.8
137% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 140
128% 196 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS72107 750GB
156GB free
Firmware: GK8OA87A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 55 55 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 52
Write 57.5
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 54.6
37% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 78%
Samsung HD254GJ 250GB
207GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 137 135 137 137 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 129
Write 31
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 135
66% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
194% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 76%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 64GB
56GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 31 31 24 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 31.2
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 28.6
40% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.5
142% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D18ADS3.16FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67.8% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 22
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 19.1
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback