Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime7 Days
Run DateAug 31 '20 at 17:19
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 186
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 357
48% 357 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Asus(1043 8387) 1.2GB
CLim: 842 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.73% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 0.12
Parallax 28
0% 9.4 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 25.7
23% 28.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 7.73%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$22
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 137 155 124 69 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 329
Write 176
Mixed 227
SusWrite 111
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 24.4
92% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 118
96% 136 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 91%
Mass Storage Device 537GB
500GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 5.3 8.2 8.2 8.3 8.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.27% Terrible
Read 13.2
Write 10.5
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 6.8
15% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.27%
Great: 6%
Mass Storage Device 537GB
500GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 13 13 13 12 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
5.49% Terrible
Read 13
Write 10.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 11.9
14% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.49%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 Kingston 9905471-006.A02LF 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 Kingston 9905471-006.A02LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback