Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '21 at 19:34
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 179
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 362
48% 362 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$22
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 113 77 31 52 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 330
Write 191
Mixed 231
SusWrite 68.7
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 0.7
44% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 35.5
DQ Write 33.4
DQ Mixed 29.9
24% 32.9 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 91%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
155GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5KA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 81 70 46 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 59.4
Write 64.9
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 69.4
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 Kingston 9905471-006.A02LF 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 Kingston 9905471-006.A02LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.2
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback