Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateApr 06 '20 at 14:28
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 91.2
54% 82.4 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 192
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Asus(1043 8387) 1.2GB
CLim: 742 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 22.3
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 27.2
18% 27.3 fps
MRender 34.3
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 23.6
21% 25.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$22
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 131 104 121 67 51 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.7% Poor
Read 243
Write 138
Mixed 166
SusWrite 97.4
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 13.7
4K Mixed 3.1
33% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 12.4
DQ Mixed 119
78% 96.5 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 Kingston 9905471-006.A02LF 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 Kingston 9905471-006.A02LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35.6% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 11.9
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 11.4
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback