MSI H170 GAMING M3 (MS-7978)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7978
MotherboardMSI H170 GAMING M3 (MS-7978)  (all builds)
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160516
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMar 23 '17 at 18:23
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 121
2-Core 233
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 604
62% 499 Pts
64-Core 637
39% 637 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 150
Parallax 142
120% 147 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 137
Splatting 109
97% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team L5 SSD 120GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1114B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 491
Write 133
Mixed 213
61% 279 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 19
111% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 18.5
28% 51.1 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 82%
Hitachi HDS721050DLE630 500GB
75GB free
Firmware: MS1OA650 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
60% Above average
Read 110
Write 99.2
Mixed 103
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 0.18
4K Mixed 0.17
49% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 60%
Great: 82%
WDC WD64 00BPVT-00HXZT1 640GB
459GB free, PID 101a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.6% Very poor
Read 39
Write 39
Mixed 37
49% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.15
66% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 20%
WD Elements 500GB
161GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 82.5
Write 82.2
Mixed 56.7
93% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.16
67% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 41%
WDC WD10EZEX-00BN5A0 1TB
8GB free, PID 1e40
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 39
Write 40.6
Mixed 39.5
52% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.26
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
66.7% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 21.8
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 20.8
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170 GAMING M3 (MS-7978) Builds (Compare 1,253 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI H170 GAMING M3 (MS-7978)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $401
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback