Dell XPS 8900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell XPS 8900  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XJ8C4
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '19 at 05:25
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 91.6
2-Core 147
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 268
30% 238 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.3
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54.6% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 94.3
55% 77.4 fps
MRender 72.5
Gravity 69
Splatting 58.4
54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 104 96 94 98 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 455
Write 416
Mixed 376
SusWrite 120
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 45.7
154% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 343
260% 351 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
478GB free
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 403 410 402 404 415 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 418
Mixed 411
SusWrite 398
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 39.2
130% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
210GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 65 59 60 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 16.7
Write 60.7
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 61.3
31% 42 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
69% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 112%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 13 13 13 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 34.5
Mixed 29
SusWrite 12.6
20% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.7
218% 2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 92%
Seagate BUP BL 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 33.8
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 12.3
21% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
171% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 66%
WD Elements 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 38
Write 37.5
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 37.8
50% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
123% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 44%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
850GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 41 41 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 40
Write 38.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 39.9
51% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 49%
Generic External 1TB
247GB free, PID 1340
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.53% Terrible
Read 36
Write 4.7
Mixed 9
SusWrite 2.9
13% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 7.53%
Great: 25%
WD PP III Studio II 500GB
1GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 33.7
Write 34.5
Mixed 24.2
39% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 20%
WDC WD10EZEX-00BN5A0 1TB
363GB free, PID 1e40
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 37
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 11
37% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
120% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 859B0000802C BLS4G4D240FSA.8FBD 859B0000802C BLS4G4D240FSA.8FBD 16GB
2133, 2133, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.5% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 23
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 18.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8900 Builds (Compare 2,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $367
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback