Dell Precision Tower 7810

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Dell Precision Tower 7810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 7810 (all builds)
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160701
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '20 at 06:52
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 360 User benchmarks, average bench 56% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Memory 76.5 1-Core 54.7 2-Core 108 50% 79.8 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 266 31% 238 Pts	64-Core 260 16% 260 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.25 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Lighting 20.7 Reflection 15.9 Parallax 19.7 17% 18.8 fps	MRender 22.5 Gravity 21.7 Splatting 15.7 16% 20 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM871 2.5 7mm 256GB 1,320 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMM02D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 47 44 42 39 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Read 359 Write 98.3 Mixed 156 SusWrite 46 36% 165 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 32.3 4K Mixed 20.5 73% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 30.7 DQ Write 56.5 DQ Mixed 31.9 28% 39.7 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 118%
WD PP III Studio II 500GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 388GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 19 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9.14% Terrible	Read 20.5 Write 18.2 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 18.2 25% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 35% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.14% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 9ASF51272PZ-2G3B1 2x4GB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2 of 8 slots used 8GB RIMM 2400 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.7% Average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 17.2 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 12.2 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 87.3 46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision Tower 7810 Builds (Compare 1,735 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7810

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	143x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	115x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples	88x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	137x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	121x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	80x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $75Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	39x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $102Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	31x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	27x

RAM
HMA41GR7AFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 95%, 876 samples	82x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	62x
M393A1G43DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 97%, 963 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16