Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory16 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170905
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 25 '20 at 15:06
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 94.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 216
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 620
62% 505 Pts
64-Core 793
49% 793 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49% Average
Lighting 60.6
Reflection 67
Parallax 59.2
49% 62.3 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 58.3
Splatting 51.9
48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_m 600_MTFDDAK256MB 256GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 462
Write 461
Mixed 366
96% 430 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 40.3
141% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 256
217% 316 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 109%
Micron M600 512GB
66GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 347 316 307 297 278 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 424
Write 406
Mixed 309
SusWrite 318
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 37.1
136% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 122
122% 190 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
133GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 97 98 100 99 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 126
Write 92
Mixed 69
SusWrite 97.1
70% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 114%
LaCie CooKey 32GB
5GB free, PID 103b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 25.2
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 22.7
34% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666 C15 3x8GB
3 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.1% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 14.2
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 16.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 57.9
69% 57.9 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $878
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback