Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150515
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateNov 20 '16 at 23:46
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 167
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 512
51% 417 Pts
64-Core 617
38% 617 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7290
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
63.4% Good
Lighting 80.6
Reflection 81.7
Parallax 79.2
66% 80.5 fps
MRender 79.4
Gravity 74
Splatting 66
59% 73.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 502
Write 405
Mixed 417
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 17.9
74% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 30
DQ Write 41.1
DQ Mixed 15.1
17% 28.7 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
323GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 503
Write 404
Mixed 419
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 18.4
79% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 16
65% 146 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666 C15 3x8GB
3 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM 1866 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 30.1
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 20.1
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $884
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback