Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System
Motherboard	Intel NUC5CPYB
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151123
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '17 at 13:14
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	Memory 40.7 1-Core 21 2-Core 40.2 23% 34 Pts	4-Core 38.8 8-Core 41.5 5% 40.2 Pts	64-Core 39.5 2% 39.5 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2060) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.32% Terrible	Lighting 1.47 Reflection 1.65 Parallax 2.34 1% 1.82 fps	MRender 1.67 Gravity 1.67 Splatting 2.26 2% 1.86 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.32% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 108GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 414 Write 125 Mixed 169 51% 236 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 21.6 4K Mixed 6.58 41% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 17 DQ Write 25.6 DQ Mixed 27 19% 23.2 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 69%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 10GB free Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 9091923 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -35811437313767 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 363 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 6 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 30 40 90196934686 (C2) HDA temperature 30 40 90196934686 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 9091923 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 9091923 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 9091923 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 55834574848 (E9) Unknown 0 0 443 (EA) Unknown 0 0 416 (F1) Unknown 0 0 416 (F2) Unknown 0 0 194 (F4) Unknown 100 100 786435	42.5% Average	Read 400 Write 120 Mixed 143 48% 221 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 38.3 4K Mixed 11 60% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 29.8 DQ Write 39.8 DQ Mixed 9.92 14% 26.5 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 1x8GB 6,120 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 5.2 16% 5.67 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 199 20% 199 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,099x
Core i7-2600Intel $173Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,629x
Core i5-3470Intel $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	966x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,159x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,093x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	850x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	460x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	441x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	526x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	384x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	307x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $322

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370