Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80FY

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80FY  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 4A6
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141021
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 25 '22 at 16:51
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N2840
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
24% Poor
Memory 42
1-Core 16.3
2-Core 28.4
21% 28.9 Pts
4-Core 36.8
8-Core 34.1
5% 35.4 Pts
64-Core 34.8
2% 34.8 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3905) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.57% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.67 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.57%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E660 500GB
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GR2ZB230
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 67 57 48 48 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 73.9
Write 86.7
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 54.7
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 5.5
13% 4.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.47 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80FY Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80FY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback