Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive68.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 29 '21 at 17:53
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 208
70% 127 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 201
28% 204 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 108GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 105 91 65 92 67 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 471
Write 356
Mixed 392
SusWrite 89.7
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 26.2
108% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 48.1
96% 192 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 130 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 152
Write 149
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 131
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 84%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 110 112 114 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 141
Write 135
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 111
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 87%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 108GB
92GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 23 15 16 15 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.1% Poor
Read 50.5
Write 10.5
Mixed 13.3
SusWrite 19.5
17% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
3968, 128 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 15.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 18.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback