Today's hottest deals

MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics93.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '20 at 13:29
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 82.5
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 852
88% 706 Pts
64-Core 1,041
64% 1,041 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 117
Parallax 111
97% 116 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 102
Splatting 86.5
86% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,314
Write 2,323
Mixed 1,705
471% 2,114 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 83.4
278% 98.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,223
DQ Write 1,045
DQ Mixed 1,143
854% 1,137 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
30GB free
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 266 257 256 257 258 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 468
Mixed 383
SusWrite 288
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 48.6
174% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 255
218% 321 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
14GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 466
Write 461
Mixed 382
97% 436 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 58.3
194% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$69
73GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 72 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 122
Write 131
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 72.2
73% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$69
25GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 106 105 102 108 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 85
Write 90.8
Mixed 67
SusWrite 104
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 88%
WDC WD40 EZRX-22SPEB0 4TB
100GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 127 132 133 132 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 124
Write 123
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 131
159% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
99% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 53%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 2GB
2GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 3.5 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
6.41% Terrible
Read 19
Write 2
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 3.2
7% 7.23 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.5
87% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.41%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 36
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 35.1
90% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 34.8
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 20,086 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $613
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback