Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '22 at 10:54
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 121
2-Core 238
80% 146 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 663
65% 530 Pts
64-Core 643
40% 643 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.2.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 60.7
Parallax 80.7
0% 47.2 fps
MRender 60.9
Gravity 61.7
Splatting 44.6
44% 55.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M5S 256GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 310 314 370 331 368 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 473
Write 340
Mixed 249
SusWrite 334
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 28
102% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 187
164% 245 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 95%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$76
241GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 452 448 455 458 441 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 445
Mixed 412
SusWrite 452
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 49.2
163% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 298
245% 349 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 113%
Great: 125%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 2GB
2GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.1 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
3.41% Terrible
Read 11.2
Write 3.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.2
7% 5.77 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.41%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KLEVV KD48GU88A-26N1600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
83% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 29.6
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 23.2
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 135% - Outstanding Total price: $279
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback