Asus VANGUARD B85

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus VANGUARD B85 (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150401
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '20 at 16:28
Run Duration	442 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1850-$27 342 User benchmarks, average bench 53% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	54.7% Above average	Memory 81.6 1-Core 81 2-Core 150 63% 104 Pts	4-Core 163 8-Core 166 22% 165 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz) 43,454 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.86% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 3.42 Parallax 2.94 2% 2.79 fps	MRender 3.57 Gravity 1.07 Splatting 3.61 2% 2.75 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.86% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$65 18,195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 514 Write 468 Mixed 349 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 39.1 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 47.9 188% 71.4 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 47.9 122% 258 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 119%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$80 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 147GB free Firmware: 82.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 87 87 87 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 87.6 Write 84.6 Mixed 66.8 SusWrite 86.6 60% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 100%
WDC WD10 0EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 5.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 157 146 155 164 163 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	Read 203 Write 203 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 159 212% 162 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 9.8 4K Mixed 0.9 369% 4.03 MB/s	DQ Read 1.6 DQ Write 6.1 DQ Mixed 1.1 251% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 94%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68MYMN1 6TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 27GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 2 2.6 0.6 0.2 1.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	31% Below average	Read 146 Write 141 Mixed 78.3 SusWrite 1.5 113% 91.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 139% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 57%
WDC WD10 0EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 299GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 23 21 21 19 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.7% Average	Read 162 Write 161 Mixed 68.3 SusWrite 21.3 127% 103 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1 210% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 54%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 86GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.3 0.7 0.1 0 2.6 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Read 122 Write 93.9 Mixed 65.1 SusWrite 0.7 84% 70.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 132% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 44%
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 35GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.6 0.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Read 138 Write 146 Mixed 66.8 SusWrite 0.4 108% 87.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.3 119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 48%
HGST HDN 728080ALE604 8TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 88GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.3 0.7 0.1 0 2.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.5% Average	Read 206 Write 206 Mixed 70 SusWrite 0.7 145% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.9 171% 2 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 48%
HGST HUH 721010ALE600 10TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1 1.2 0.3 0 30 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.9% Average	Read 190 Write 196 Mixed 73.8 SusWrite 5.7 142% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 1.2 232% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 46%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 4GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 153 Write 126 Mixed 77.1 142% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 139% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 44%
WDC WD10 0EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 457GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.6 5.4 4.3 4.3 8.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Read 96.9 Write 109 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 5.3 84% 66.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.3 216% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 85%
WDC WD50 EZRZ-32GZ5B1 5TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.6 5.3 4.3 4.3 8.5 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Read 151 Write 125 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 5.3 107% 89 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 139% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 58%
WDC WD50 EZRZ-32GZ5B1 5TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 513GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 4.6 5.4 4.3 4.3 8.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 134 Write 106 Mixed 71.7 SusWrite 5.3 96% 79.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 133% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 58%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 168GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.6 5.4 4.3 4.3 8.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Read 105 Write 101 Mixed 60.9 SusWrite 5.3 85% 68.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 61%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 70GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 129 111 130 133 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 152 Write 145 Mixed 79 SusWrite 125 166% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 61%
WDC WD10 0EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 84 86 86 86 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 132 Write 131 Mixed 63.6 SusWrite 84.5 134% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 9.7 4K Mixed 1 368% 3.9 MB/s	DQ Read 0.5 DQ Write 5.5 DQ Mixed 1.3 233% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 86%
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 692GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 84 86 86 86 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	56.1% Above average	Read 157 Write 167 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 84.4 156% 120 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.2 209% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 62%
WDC WD50 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 5TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 989GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 84 86 86 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 136 Write 118 Mixed 76.8 SusWrite 84.4 135% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 133% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 19,522 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1400 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.7% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 8.3 27% 9.57 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 9.3 26% 9 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VANGUARD B85 Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus VANGUARD B85 - $7,816

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	76x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	47x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	35x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	34x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	25x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
SATA SSD 480GBKioxia-exceriaBench 78%, 7,893 samples	15x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	13x

RAM
BLT4G3D1608DT1TX0. 4x4GBCrucialBench 53%, 1,688 samples	13x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $7,994

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16