Today's hottest deals

Asus B85M-G R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus B85M-G R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '16 at 06:19
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1850-$23
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 174
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 175
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4352
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.01% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 3.54
Parallax 3.16
2% 2.91 fps
MRender 5.14
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.01%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 119
Write 106
Mixed 104
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
327GB free
Firmware: SD1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 94.6
Write 93.3
Mixed 90.7
70% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.51
117% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT25664BA160B.C8FE 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1400 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 16.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-G R2.0 Builds (Compare 835 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback