PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus B150M-A (all builds) |
Memory | 10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150924 |
Uptime | 4.9 Days |
Run Date | Dec 18 '20 at 23:15 |
Run Duration | 393 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 27% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
80.8%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
34.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
S405S240G 240GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 113 101 102 102 98 MB/s
|
52.2%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
108GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 110 111 111 111 MB/s
|
79.5%
Very good
|
|||
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 90 92 91 90 93 MB/s
|
44.2%
Average
|
|||
WDC WD10 0EFAX-68LHPN0 10TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 MB/s
|
20.8%
Poor
|
|||
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
415GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 21 20 20 22 MB/s
|
20.3%
Poor
|
|||
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 21 20 20 22 MB/s
|
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 21 20 20 22 MB/s
|
30.2%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 21 20 20 22 MB/s
|
23.2%
Poor
|
|||
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
435GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 21 20 20 22 MB/s
|
30.6%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 21 20 20 22 MB/s
|
24.8%
Poor
|
|||
WDC WD30 EZRS-00J99B0 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 21 20 20 22 MB/s
|
30.2%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD10 0EFAX-68LHPN0 10TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 92 91 90 94 MB/s
|
51.6%
Above average
|
|||
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB
952GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 89 92 91 90 93 MB/s
|
44.2%
Average
|
|||
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
1TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 MB/s
|
11.2%
Very poor
|
|||
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB
91GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 MB/s
|
10%
Very poor
|
|||
WDC WD60 EZRX-00MVLB1 6TB
851GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 MB/s
|
14.2%
Very poor
|
|||
21.4%
Poor
|
||||
WDC WD10 0EFAX-68LHPN0 10TB
307GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 MB/s
|
20.8%
Poor
|
|||
WDC WD80 EFAX-68KNBN0 8TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 MB/s
|
20.4%
Poor
|
|||
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
508GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 36 36 MB/s
|
20.4%
Poor
|
|||
WDC WD10 0EFAX-68LHPN0 10TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 150 142 138 138 146 MB/s
|
71.7%
Very good
|
|||
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 92 91 90 95 MB/s
|
49.9%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
78%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700Intel $150Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 266x |
Core i5-6500Intel $90Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 255x |
Core i5-6400Intel $62Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 245x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 141x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 137x |
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 122x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 49% - Average | Total price: $858 |