Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics86.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190129
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateNov 02 '19 at 01:01
Run Duration452 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$385
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 601
8-Core 978
97% 790 Pts
64-Core 1590
98% 1590 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.9% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 90.7
Parallax 99
90% 100 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 100
Splatting 77.7
81% 103 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
73GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 363 403 416 422 417 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 408
Mixed 376
SusWrite 386
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 46.8
154% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 294
239% 340 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 106%
Great: 123%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$63
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 616 791 882 904 916 903 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,994
Write 861
Mixed 816
SusWrite 835
249% 1,127 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 50.7
192% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 579
DQ Write 950
DQ Mixed 670
534% 733 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 224%
Great: 372%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
552GB free
Firmware: SBFK61F1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 396 391 426 413 422 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 179
Write 104
Mixed 120
SusWrite 408
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 29
99% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 204
144% 180 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$151
931GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 437 427 440 429 438 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 408
Mixed 343
SusWrite 435
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 40.9
148% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 276
227% 325 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 105%
Great: 121%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 92 90 92 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 97.7
Write 97.8
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 90.9
66% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 100%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68MYMN1 6TB
3TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 87 88 87 90 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 170
Write 164
Mixed 121
SusWrite 87.7
178% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
139% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 57%
WDC WD10 0EFAX-68LHPN0 10TB
3.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 87 88 87 90 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 195
Write 190
Mixed 132
SusWrite 87.5
197% 151 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 1
278% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 69%
WDC WD60 EZRX-00MVLB1 6TB
353GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 87 88 87 90 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 95
Write 94.2
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 87.4
119% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 47%
WDC WD10 0EFAX-68LHPN0 10TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 87 88 87 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 136
Write 147
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 87.5
155% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.3
221% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 69%
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 103 102 102 105 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 130
Write 138
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 104
147% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.2
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 48%
WDC WD10 0EFAX-68LHPN0 10TB
7TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 135 130 123 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 186
Write 192
Mixed 138
SusWrite 129
216% 162 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 1.2
271% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 76%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
22GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 136 130 123 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 138
Write 139
Mixed 102
SusWrite 129
172% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 65%
ST12000V N0007-2GS116 12TB
3TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1.7 2.1 1.5 2.4 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.5% Below average
Read 122
Write 111
Mixed 145
SusWrite 4.8
125% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
217% 8.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 54%
ST6000VN 0041-2EL11C 6TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 161 160 162 161 161 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.9% Excellent
Read 220
Write 186
Mixed 136
SusWrite 160
231% 176 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.1
242% 6.77 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 84%
WDC WD60 EZRX-00MVLB1 6TB
3.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 7 8.2 7.1 8.5 9.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 154
Write 153
Mixed 118
SusWrite 7.8
138% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 47%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1.7 2.1 1.6 2.4 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
23% Poor
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 4.6
91% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23%
Great: 54%
WDC WD60 EZRX-11MVLB1 6TB
229GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 159 157 159 158 158 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.8% Good
Read 176
Write 167
Mixed 103
SusWrite 157
201% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
136% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 69%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68MYMN1 6TB
559GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 1.7 2.2 1.6 2.3 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
27% Poor
Read 124
Write 124
Mixed 100
SusWrite 3.6
112% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 27%
Great: 57%
ST6000VN 0041-2EL11C 6TB
1TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 1.8 2.1 1.5 2.4 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.5% Below average
Read 178
Write 150
Mixed 136
SusWrite 4.8
146% 117 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.1
186% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 84%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
2.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 158 156 159 158 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 125
Write 126
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 157
174% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.6% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 21.1
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 23.7
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XI EXTREME Builds (Compare 593 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,014
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback