Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics84.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive377% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190909
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '20 at 14:55
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 83.6
1-Core 153
2-Core 280
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 989
90% 753 Pts
64-Core 1,409
87% 1,409 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 111
Parallax 95.5
87% 105 fps
MRender 97.4
Gravity 95.5
Splatting 98.3
80% 97.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 1TB
834GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A4SANA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2316 2346 2344 2353 1317 1016 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
377% Outstanding
Read 2,629
Write 2,384
Mixed 239
SusWrite 1,948
401% 1,800 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 90
312% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,261
DQ Write 1,283
DQ Mixed 563
618% 1,036 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 377%
Great: 373%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
21GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 497
Write 449
Mixed 401
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 57.6
190% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
507GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 115 114 115 115 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 182
Write 158
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 113
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 184 186 184 183 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 148
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 182
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 114%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
481GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 59 58 58 59 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 46.5
Write 51.3
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 57.9
36% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 63%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
202GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 83 82 83 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 83.5
Write 84
Mixed 68
SusWrite 82.8
108% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
96% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate FreeAgent 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 3008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 0 17 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
10% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 28.5
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 19
31% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 34.3
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 34.7
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $779
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback