Asus TS700-E7-RS8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAsus TS700-E7-RS8  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D16 Series
Memory60.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime8.3 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '20 at 00:48
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Memory 41.8
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 94.5
35% 61.2 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 376
32% 277 Pts
64-Core 1,196
74% 1,196 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 58%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 117 121 124 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 426
Write 141
Mixed 192
SusWrite 121
48% 220 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 29.3
104% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 162
122% 165 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
73.4% Very good
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 31.3
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 5.2
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback