Intel S2600CP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardIntel S2600CP  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '20 at 14:22
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 108
49% 78.3 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 406
36% 304 Pts
64-Core 1,308
81% 1,308 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 85D9) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 34.6
Reflection 24.5
Parallax 33.8
28% 31 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 32.1
Splatting 31.4
27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 291 298 293 290 291 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 467
Write 306
Mixed 266
SusWrite 292
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 30.2
109% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 221
178% 251 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 128%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$70
77GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 277 276 277 276 291 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 457
Write 288
Mixed 324
SusWrite 296
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 54.1
4K Mixed 38
126% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 224
187% 270 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 118%
WD WD30EURX 3TB-$122
386GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 83 83 84 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 82.5
Write 77.5
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 83.5
52% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 83%
WD WD30EURX 3TB-$122
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 143 141 145 145 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 133
Write 138
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 143
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 83%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
10GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 3.6 5.5 6 3.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
4.82% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 2.8
Mixed 10.3
SusWrite 5.1
11% 9.92 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.6
30% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.82%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170GB0-CK0 M393B5170GB0-CK0 M393B5170GB0-CK0 M393B5170GB0-CK0 M393B5170GB0-CK0 M393B5170GB0-CK0 M393B5170FH0-CH9 M393B5170FH0-CH9 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 45.7
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 33.1
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.5
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S2600CP Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Intel S2600CP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback