MSI X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150320
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '20 at 17:42
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$143
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 89.3
1-Core 34.3
2-Core 70.4
46% 64.7 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 270
24% 206 Pts
64-Core 561
35% 561 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gigabyte(1458 3672) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.3% Above average
Lighting 67.2
Reflection 77.9
Parallax 74
55% 73 fps
MRender 79.3
Gravity 74
Splatting 66.7
59% 73.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 350 330 335 331 342 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 462
Mixed 355
SusWrite 355
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 39.9
130% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 290
204% 257 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 131%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
556GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 117 122 122 124 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 167
Write 70.5
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 118
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 177 178 176 180 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 182
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 178
103% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
General USB Flash Disk 2GB
1GB free, PID 800b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 5.1 5 5 5 5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.92% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 4.3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 4.9
8% 6.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.92%
Great: 5%
Generic- Compact Flash 64GB
41GB free, PID 0151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 1.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
8.72% Terrible
Read 32
Write 28.5
Mixed 27
SusWrite 1.8
28% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.6
102% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.72%
Great: 15%
Generic- SD/MMC 32GB
27GB free, PID 0151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.8 17 17 17 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
8.21% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 9.7
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 14.6
18% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
54% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.21%
Great: 16%
Intenso Rainbow Line 32GB
28GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 5.7 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Read 23
Write 7.3
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 7.1
11% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 8ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 8ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 35.5
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 9.9
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885) Builds (Compare 1,551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $493
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback