Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '18 at 05:44
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 224
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 624
61% 502 Pts
64-Core 627
39% 627 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.9.2
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 27.2
17% 21.7 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 21
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 203 248 241 219 284 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39% Below average
Read 246
Write 97.3
Mixed 85
SusWrite 244
37% 168 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 19.5
4K Mixed 10.7
45% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 14.5
DQ Write 15.7
DQ Mixed 14.7
11% 15 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39%
Great: 100%
Adata HM900 3TB
976GB free
Firmware: 9401
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 133
Mixed 122
91% 120 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
494% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 98%
Generic- Compact Flash 64GB
30GB free, PID 0151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 6 9.4 6.4 9.1 6.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 3
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 7.1
11% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.5
108% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
79% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 25.8
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 23.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 79%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback