Today's hottest deals

DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T/9000  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '22 at 07:43
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 138
61% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 344
38% 301 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5870
AMD(1002 0B00) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 27.6
Reflection 20.6
Parallax 24.7
22% 24.3 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 11.2
12% 15.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$80
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 37 23 39 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 47
Write 28.3
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 39
24% 33 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
86% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 41%
Generic- Compact Flash 64GB
60GB free, PID 0151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 26.9
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 27
36% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.8
118% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
34.9% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 10.5
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 11.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 473 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback