Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '20 at 14:29
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 96.1
1-Core 138
2-Core 271
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 724
72% 587 Pts
64-Core 712
44% 712 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 117
Parallax 236
113% 164 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 134
Splatting 162
115% 137 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 111%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,210
Write 5,912
Mixed 6,138
1,430% 6,420 MB/s
4K Read 608
4K Write 265
4K Mixed 359
1,521% 411 MB/s
DQ Read 1,241
DQ Write 686
DQ Mixed 878
676% 935 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77
143GB free
Firmware: JF4OA0D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 75 76 75 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 121
Write 106
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 74.8
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
426GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 124 125 125 125 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 124
Write 126
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 125
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1
165% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
59GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 111 110 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 96.8
Write 99
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 109
66% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 69%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$99
387GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 104 104 103 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 95.7
Write 101
Mixed 52
SusWrite 103
64% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57%
Great: 54%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
37GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 37
Mixed 35.3
40% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.8
116% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 111%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 500GB
181GB free, PID 01de
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 58 58 58 58 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 54.5
Write 37.5
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 56.9
62% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25%
Great: 41%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 500GB
144GB free, PID 01de
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 93 93 92 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 87.7
Write 87.2
Mixed 39
SusWrite 92.6
102% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 41%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
2TB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 115 69 112 99 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 143
Write 141
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 103
143% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.5
189% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1904 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.6% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 21.8
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 22.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 53.5
75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $930
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback