Microsoft Surface Pro 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicrosoft Surface Pro 4  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft Surface Pro 4
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2736 x 1824 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190418
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 08 '20 at 12:39
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6650U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 70.9
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 153
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 240
30% 228 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 540
Microsoft(1414 0015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6299
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
6.02% Terrible
Lighting 7.57
Reflection 5.92
Parallax 6.97
6% 6.82 fps
MRender 7.86
Gravity 5.53
Splatting 7.48
6% 6.96 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZFLV512 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV75M0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 473 422 515 496 530 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 796
Write 567
Mixed 375
SusWrite 469
123% 552 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 30.8
110% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 669
DQ Write 387
DQ Mixed 317
292% 458 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 118%
Great: 143%
USB 3.0 super high speed 2TB
689GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 122 109 126 126 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 211
Write 184
Mixed 201
SusWrite 121
239% 179 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 18
1,241% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 38.6
DQ Mixed 29.2
2,395% 30.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
USB 3.0 super high speed 500GB
109GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 123 110 126 126 132 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.3% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 196
Mixed 219
SusWrite 121
248% 183 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 10.2
818% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 21.1
DQ Write 38.8
DQ Mixed 26.8
2,310% 28.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 96%
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 1TB
808GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 116 114 119 129 145 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
119% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 136
Mixed 116
SusWrite 119
182% 143 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 19.4
4K Mixed 18
1,333% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 27.1
DQ Write 35.5
DQ Mixed 28.6
2,281% 30.4 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 119%
Great: 153%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 45.5
MC Mixed 19.6
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Surface Pro 4 Builds (Compare 2,977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Microsoft Surface Pro 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback