Asus SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151027
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 27 '20 at 10:06
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 94.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 246
89% 157 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 670
70% 563 Pts
64-Core 655
40% 655 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Zotac(19DA 1370) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.4% Good
Lighting 76.6
Reflection 77.5
Parallax 70.7
62% 75 fps
MRender 77
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 62.5
56% 70.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$72
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0126A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 365 448 439 434 438 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 435
Mixed 414
SusWrite 408
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 58
198% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 282
234% 336 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 121%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 194 195 196 195 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 196
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 194
121% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 112%
Great: 105%
USB3.0 high speed 320GB
101GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 93 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 95.5
Write 94.2
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 92.8
109% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 38%
USB 3.0 super high speed 500GB
19GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 64 64 64 64 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.5% Poor
Read 58.7
Write 39
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 63.8
67% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
60.2% Good
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.3
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 20.2
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 57.6
70% 57.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 719 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK 2 - $183

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $831
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback