| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Samsung Q330 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG Q330 |
| Memory | 3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100708 |
| Uptime | 4.3 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 09 '19 at 10:36 |
| Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
| Run User | POL-User |
| Background CPU | 42% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
37.3%
Below average
|
40% 66.5 Pts
|
16% 121 Pts
|
8% 129 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C557) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2104
|
0.76%
Terrible
|
1% 1.05 fps
|
1% 1.06 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$68
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 15 7.6 3.3 8 32 MB/s
|
13.4%
Very poor
|
17% 22.5 MB/s
|
50% 0.43 MB/s
| |
|
USB 3.0 super high speed 2TB
848GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 23 23 22 MB/s
|
12.4%
Very poor
|
30% 21.8 MB/s
|
52% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
21.5%
Poor
|
22% 7.57 GB/s
|
14% 5.07 GB/s
|
28% 146 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Q330 Builds (Compare 15 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung Q330
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples | 8x |
| Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples | 3x |
| Core i3 M 350Intel $199Bench 38%, 14,351 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 13x |
| GeForce 310MNvidiaBench 1%, 8,303 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $203 |