Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '19 at 16:10
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 87.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 693
72% 579 Pts
64-Core 941
58% 941 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.1% Good
Lighting 81.3
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 73.8
66% 77.2 fps
MRender 68.6
Gravity 75.1
Splatting 57.5
54% 67.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2218 835 819 823 825 819 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 2,516
Write 2,395
Mixed 1,867
SusWrite 1,056
439% 1,959 MB/s
4K Read 63.8
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 83.1
274% 93.7 MB/s
DQ Read 990
DQ Write 687
DQ Mixed 904
657% 860 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 288%
Great: 346%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 99 100 101 101 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 101
Write 96.6
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 98.7
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 55%
ST325062 3A 250GB
221GB free, PID 6830
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14% Very poor
Read 36.1
Write 13
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 28.2
32% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
54% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$33
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 44.2
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 34.5
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 29.8
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,947 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $307
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback