Asus H61M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H61M-A  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600x1200x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '19 at 13:15
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 174
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 238
32% 238 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Asus(1043 03EA) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
7.32% Terrible
Lighting 9.37
Reflection 9.23
Parallax 7.28
8% 8.63 fps
MRender 8.71
Gravity 6.53
Splatting 9.09
7% 8.11 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.32%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 182 194 199 199 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 201
Mixed 84.1
SusWrite 194
124% 170 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 10.8
Mixed 15.8
SusWrite 11.4
13% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 64%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
4GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 3.2 3.2 3 3.3 3.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2.77% Terrible
Read 12.8
Write 1.5
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 2.9
5% 5.17 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.77%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-A Builds (Compare 225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback