PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8B75-M LE (all builds) |
Memory | 4.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121016 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 06 '22 at 16:25 |
Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
Run User | IDN-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-3240
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
42.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 39 16 39 53 71 MB/s
|
33.7%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
3TB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 75 87 90 87 98 MB/s
|
38.1%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99P5471-011.A00LF 0080 KF1600DDAD3 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
|
41.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 106x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 87x |
Core i3-3220Intel $92Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 47x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 56x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 34x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 26x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $332 |