Today's hottest deals

Asus P8B75-M LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M LE  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '22 at 16:25
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 116
47% 79.8 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 175
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 36.7
Reflection 40.4
Parallax 39.5
30% 38.9 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 27.1
27% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 39 16 39 53 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 75.3
Write 43.7
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 42
37% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
3TB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 75 87 90 87 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 41.8
Write 81.5
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 89.9
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.4
138% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-011.A00LF 0080 KF1600DDAD3 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.7% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 13.8
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M LE Builds (Compare 594 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback