QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	62.4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 62.4GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	59.8 GB free of 62.4023 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 20 '19 at 15:55
Run Duration	105 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670 16 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Memory 65.9 1-Core 73.7 2-Core 139 54% 93 Pts	4-Core 283 8-Core 579 51% 431 Pts	64-Core 959 59% 959 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% AMD(1002 0B37) CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.7.1 Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.3% Average	Lighting 52 Reflection 59.1 Parallax 66.7 42% 59.2 fps	MRender 57.2 Gravity 49.2 Splatting 49.3 42% 51.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 53%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 952GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 269 282 289 289 290 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.5% Below average	Read 321 Write 288 Mixed 112 SusWrite 282 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.6 8% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 62GB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 14748 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.3% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 14.6 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 8.7 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 179%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	21x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $350Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	30x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	141x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	74x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $350

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406