Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	44.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	31.2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 31.2GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	29.3 GB free of 31.25 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '19 at 11:53
Run Duration	104 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690 12 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	66.3% Good	Memory 77.3 1-Core 82.6 2-Core 156 62% 105 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 566 51% 432 Pts	64-Core 575 36% 575 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% AMD(1002 0B37) CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.7.1 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.7% Average	Lighting 54.5 Reflection 61.6 Parallax 69.3 44% 61.8 fps	MRender 62 Gravity 53 Splatting 52.1 45% 55.7 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 53%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 360 369 366 366 367 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.7% Below average	Read 373 Write 347 Mixed 107 SusWrite 362 67% 297 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.6 9% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 31GB 257 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 0, 0 MHz 16384, 15616 MB Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.5% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 7.1 22% 7.53 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 8.1 24% 8.43 GB/s	Latency 85.7 47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 203%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	21x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $88Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $350