QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory31.3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 31.3GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory26 GB free of 31.2969 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '21 at 23:05
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 70.6
1-Core 134
2-Core 278
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 1,098
97% 824 Pts
64-Core 3,240
200% 3,240 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.7% Excellent
Lighting 100
Reflection 109
Parallax 98.6
82% 102 fps
MRender 91.3
Gravity 101
Splatting 96.9
79% 96.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 215GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 953 818 889 1078 943 1018 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 31GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 15664 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
203% Outstanding
MC Read 78.1
MC Write 88.2
MC Mixed 83.1
238% 83.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 35.6
76% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 203%
Great: 203%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback