QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory19.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '21 at 02:41
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 119
53% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 556
47% 406 Pts
64-Core 943
58% 943 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Lighting 38.8
Reflection 43.2
Parallax 40.3
32% 40.8 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 41
Splatting 28.9
29% 36.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 69GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 22 22 22 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 24GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.5% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback