Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory24.2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24.2GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory19.2 GB free of 24.2197 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '21 at 16:42
Run Duration359 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 56.8
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 154
54% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 512
48% 399 Pts
64-Core 704
44% 704 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 389GB
234GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 300 270 329 296 293 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Qemu HARDDISK 1TB
706GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 585 362 533 379 333 330 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Red Hat VirtIO 101GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 77 80 79 81 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Qemu HARDDISK 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 42 60 57 141 52 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 70% Great: 101%
Qemu HARDDISK 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 24 118 65 48 149 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 70% Great: 101%
Qemu HARDDISK 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 162 183 154 188 174 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 70% Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 24GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 8417 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.7% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback