Today's hottest deals

Alienware 17 R3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics70.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware 17 R3  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0WJ10R
Memory4.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170728
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateDec 19 '19 at 19:33
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 70.7
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 162
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 464
47% 382 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Dell(1028 0708) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.91% Terrible
Lighting 6.33
Reflection 8.58
Parallax 5.81
5% 6.91 fps
MRender 7.57
Gravity 5.57
Splatting 12.4
7% 8.52 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.91%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1070-$200
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.1% Very good
Lighting 84.9
Reflection 103
Parallax 88.4
69% 92.2 fps
MRender 86.2
Gravity 86.6
Splatting 90
72% 87.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 30 37 43 44 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 550
Write 37.7
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 42.5
38% 179 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 18.9
99% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 456
DQ Write 62.2
DQ Mixed 125
126% 214 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 147%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
85GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 336 378 393 399 389 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 439
Write 395
Mixed 344
SusWrite 379
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 34.3
110% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 296
224% 304 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 134%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 1TB-$65
19GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 378
Write 394
Mixed 330
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 26.4
88% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 195
174% 265 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 104%
Asmt ASM1352R-PM 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 54 92 96 96 89 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.9% Very poor
Read 122
Write 45.5
Mixed 83
SusWrite 76.9
18% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 0.9
7% 3.77 MB/s
DQ Read 1.7
DQ Write 10.5
DQ Mixed 2.8
3% 5 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 91%
Asmt ASM1352R-PM 8TB
263GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 56 92 96 96 88 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
9.62% Terrible
Read 76.3
Write 69.5
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 76.9
17% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 0.6
6% 3.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1.4
DQ Write 5.8
DQ Mixed 2
2% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 9.62%
Great: 91%
Asmt 2105 6TB
20GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 0.9 0 0 0 2.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 35
Write 30.2
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 0.7
18% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 103%
Asmt 2105 3TB
946GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 37.2
Write 38
Mixed 24
25% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1A2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 19.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 16.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 17 R3 Builds (Compare 1,476 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware 17 R3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback