Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 176%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 190%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics216% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory55.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 16 '22 at 01:54
Run Duration353 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$325
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 73.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 245
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 863
81% 675 Pts
64-Core 1,657
102% 1,657 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$535
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
216% Outstanding
Lighting 318
Reflection 298
Parallax 345
260% 321 fps
MRender 365
Gravity 265
Splatting 196
216% 275 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 216%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 401 408 410 409 416 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 467
Mixed 428
SusWrite 409
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 97.7
4K Mixed 48.3
169% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 353
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 113%
Great: 131%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$265
121GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1786 1701 1803 1641 1461 1319 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 2,136
Write 1,948
Mixed 1,405
SusWrite 1,618
399% 1,777 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 65.7
253% 99 MB/s
DQ Read 1,260
DQ Write 1,080
DQ Mixed 1,164
874% 1,168 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 313%
Great: 425%
Asmt ASM1352R-PM 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 258 257 258 258 258 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.3% Excellent
Read 479
Write 458
Mixed 403
SusWrite 258
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 35.4
115% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 242
180% 238 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 91%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$240
682GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 193 193 193 193 193 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 366
Write 331
Mixed 327
SusWrite 193
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 41.6
139% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 240
180% 240 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 122%
Asmt ASM1352R-PM 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 258 257 257 258 257 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.5% Excellent
Read 475
Write 458
Mixed 402
SusWrite 257
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 35.6
116% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 241
180% 238 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 91%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$240
669GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 193 193 193 193 193 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 367
Write 359
Mixed 312
SusWrite 193
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 41
141% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 240
180% 241 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 81%
Great: 122%
Seagate Expansion Desk 16TB
7TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 41.3
Write 40.7
Mixed 34.6
SusWrite 41.8
9% 39.6 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 1.4
21% 6.9 MB/s
DQ Read 3.4
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 1.5
3% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 38%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 171 185 192 190 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 125
Write 149
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 179
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
220% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 90%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 41 41 42 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 36.8
Write 37.4
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 41
27% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.9
260% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 61.4
MC Mixed 34.7
125% 43.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 10.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,775 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $539
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback