Biostar A780L3C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar A780L3C  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 30 '19 at 17:55
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron X2 190
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
26.3% Poor
Memory 43
1-Core 28.2
2-Core 52.7
27% 41.3 Pts
4-Core 59.6
8-Core 51.8
8% 55.7 Pts
64-Core 51
3% 51 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
Biostar(1565 0017) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.43% Terrible
Lighting 0.47
Reflection 0.96
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.53 fps
MRender 0.67
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.91
0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.43%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X1120G 120GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 146 150 147 152 136 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.9% Poor
Read 156
Write 127
Mixed 116
SusWrite 144
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 9.3
41% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 23.6
DQ Write 46.7
DQ Mixed 26.9
23% 32.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
906GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 151 152 151 157 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 160
Write 154
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 148
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 109%
SAMSUNG HM641JX 640GB
193GB free, PID a02a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 4 4.8 4.4 7.2 5.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
8.55% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 11.5
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 4.9
18% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.55%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
533, 533 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 7
14% 4.87 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 3.2
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A780L3C Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A780L3C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback