Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics63.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 28 '18 at 22:05
Run Duration410 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 258
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 686
73% 581 Pts
64-Core 687
42% 687 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Zotac(19DA 1370) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.31
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
63.3% Good
Lighting 80.3
Reflection 85
Parallax 74.6
65% 80 fps
MRender 79.8
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 66.8
59% 73.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 352
Write 177
Mixed 287
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 4.24
81% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 5.53
52% 119 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 85%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
303GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 150
Write 146
Mixed 121
104% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.17
82% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 100%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$51
367GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 151
Mixed 140
117% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 2.44
4K Mixed 0.34
120% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 108%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
72GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 133
Write 136
Mixed 126
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.2
94% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 112%
Samsung HM160HI 160GB-$50
67GB free
Firmware: HH100-08 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 49.1
Write 50
Mixed 47.5
37% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.31
73% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 36%
SAMSUNG HM641JX 640GB
204GB free, PID a02a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 39.8
Write 42.3
Mixed 38.9
52% 40.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.36
64% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 20%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
56GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 39.5
Mixed 29
45% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.19
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 42%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
42GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 39.4
Write 39.3
Mixed 33.7
48% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.17
65% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 42%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 123
Write 9.27
Mixed 18.8
42% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.04
42% 3.61 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.5% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 19.2
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 23.8
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 54.5
73% 54.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 1,725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 - $162

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $810
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback