Asus M4A78LT-M-LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M4A78LT-M-LE  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '19 at 16:59
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
AM3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 44.3
2-Core 86.4
47% 70.8 Pts
4-Core 82.6
8-Core 73.6
11% 78.1 Pts
64-Core 82.6
5% 82.6 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
Asus(1043 8388) 256MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.46% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 0.28
0% 0.72 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 1.04
1% 0.66 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.46%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 77 81 88 91 94 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.6% Below average
Read 206
Write 190
Mixed 186
SusWrite 82.3
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 17.2
76% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 26.5
DQ Write 76.1
DQ Mixed 21.8
25% 41.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 100%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
456GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 93 95 95 94 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 103
Write 60.4
Mixed 51.6
SusWrite 90.6
56% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 59%
WD WD3200YS-01PGB0 320GB
70GB free
Firmware: 21.00M21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 55 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 54.7
Write 54.8
Mixed 40.9
SusWrite 54.5
38% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 36%
SMI 16GB
14GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 6 6.2 7 6.8 6.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
4.59% Terrible
Read 17.9
Write 5
Mixed 12
SusWrite 7
13% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.59%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
23.5% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A78LT-M-LE Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A78LT-M-LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback