Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite Pro P200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite Pro P200  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA ISRAA
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070927
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 25 '19 at 20:02
Run Duration330 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T7500-$90
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 23.7
2-Core 44.8
33% 45.1 Pts
4-Core 47.4
8-Core 44.6
6% 46 Pts
64-Core 38.9
2% 38.9 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600
Toshiba(1179 FF01) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.24% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.62
Parallax 0.84
1% 1.59 fps
MRender 1.95
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 2.87
2% 1.84 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.24%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHY2250BH 250GB-$31
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0040020B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 4 7.6 12 16 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 34
Write 36
Mixed 20
SusWrite 8.4
18% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
67% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 30%
Fujitsu MHY2250BH 250GB-$31
153GB free
Firmware: 0040020B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 42 40 42 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 46.5
Write 46
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 39.8
30% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 30%
Generic SD02G SD Card 2GB
2GB free
Firmware: 3.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.6 8.3 7.3 7.6 7.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
8.02% Terrible
Read 19
Write 8.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 7.9
7% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.02%
Great: 10%
Verbatim STORE N GO 32GB
19GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Mixed 4.1
7% 4.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
827GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 9.2 2.7 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 14.8
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 15.8
26% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 12%
Great: 40%
ST5000DM 000-1FK178 5TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 25
Write 20.3
Mixed 16
SusWrite 0.3
19% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.5
188% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19%
Great: 84%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB
77GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 0.2 3.7 16 7.5 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 26
Write 20
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 5.1
22% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.5
174% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19%
Great: 92%
ST14000D M001-2JC101 14TB
6.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.1 0 0.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.4% Poor
Read 29.3
Write 20.5
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 0.3
22% 18 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
262% 3.93 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite Pro P200 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Toshiba Satellite Pro P200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback